We help teams ship faster — without rebuilding the way you work
Your process stays yours. We work out where the time actually goes in manual testing, and set the tooling up so that less of it goes there.
A field that refused to take a value. Before, that meant a dead end and a manual workaround.
MUI forms. Custom selects and date pickers now fill all the way through.
Calls to run the same process a second time — the repeat follows a saved recipe.
Fields filled — counted by the page itself, not by our report about ourselves.
A 40-field form: by hand against the engine. A person still checks the result.
These are our measurements on our own benches. You get one measurement before the pilot and one after — that pair is the only comparison worth making.
We do not automate testing. We take the load off manual testers.
Autotests, CI and the pyramid are your territory and none of our business. We work only on the mechanics: forty fields typed by hand, the third run of the same scenario, that scenario again in three browsers. The call on whether something is a bug stays exactly where it was — with a person, who now has time to make it thoughtfully.
We do not write or rewrite your autotests
Not the framework, not the pipeline, not the coverage. Your test code stays untouched.
We do not shrink the manual team
We come to people who are staying. What leaves the process is the routine, not the person.
We do not decide for anyone whether it is a bug
The engine brings the system to the state you asked for and shows the result. The verdict is human.
We take away typing, repeats and “the same thing in three browsers”
A process walked once is saved as a recipe and repeats in a handful of calls.
We also set up what you already have
If our engine is not right for you, we will look at your tools: often they can do what is needed and are simply configured for another job.
We leave a written order behind
Checklists, recipes and reports that do not depend on who happens to be on shift today.
Five steps, and you can stop after any of them
A conversation
Half an hour: you describe where checking slows down, we say whether we see a job for ourselves there. If we do not, we say so — free, and with nothing attached.
Measurement
We take three or four of your scenarios and time them as they run today. Without that number, “it got better” is a conversation about nothing.
Setup
We fit the tool to your forms and widgets. Our engine or yours, whichever sits better. We work in the browser your people already have open.
Checking the result
The same measurement as at the start. The difference is counted by your stopwatch, not by our account of ourselves.
Further, if you want
If you like, we connect the rest of the scenarios and stay on support. If not, everything set up stays with the team. The first year of tool licences sits inside the engagement; from the second it is an ordinary licence — from $149 a seat a year, and less for a team of ten or more.
Not “magic inside”, but a log a person reads
Every step is named out loud and lands in the log. If a field is stubborn, the engine tries another way and says so — red is reserved for an actual refusal from the application.
The difference here is not typing speed. Seven minutes is seven minutes during which the tester is not thinking. That is what we take away — not their work.
The tool lives in the browser your team already has open
Their profile, their logins, their live session. Nothing is installed on work machines and window focus is never taken — a person keeps working while the run goes on. On a foreign domain the tool refuses: it does not wander outside the system under test.
Spacing gets measured by eye — and the task comes back from review
Developers have machine access to the design, but almost nobody is in the habit of using it: values are eyeballed, and then review turns into an argument about “more air here”. We build the habit of taking numbers from the design and checking the built page against them. Two sets of numbers are compared, and the argument ends before it starts.
A demonstration: on the left the numbers from the design, on the right the ones measured on the rendered page. Two mismatches, each named by address rather than called “off”.
Only what actually costs you time gets taken
Form filling
Forty fields in one go, custom selects, date pickers and step attachments included.
Repeating a scenario
A process walked once is saved as a recipe: the second run takes a call per step.
One scenario, three browsers
The same form runs on another engine, and the comparison is factual: accepted or refused.
Design against build
Numbers from the design against numbers from the page. Mismatches listed with the node address.
Access boundaries
The tool refuses everything outside the system under test. Arbitrary code is never executed.
Reports for review
A run exports so that both a developer and a manager can read it — no retelling out loud.
It usually starts with one sentence
“Regression takes three days, and two of them are people typing into forms.” Then it turns out the autotests exist and are even green — the manual half simply never went away and grows with the product.
Regression runs into manual typing
The scenario needs the system brought to a state: a request, a contract, three reference books. Half a day goes into preparation rather than checking.
The same scenario is run three times
Once more after the fix, once more in another browser. By hand it is equally dull all three times.
Experience is spent on mechanics
A strong specialist spends half a day on something that needs neither experience nor attention. It is usually the first thing they raise one to one.
Front-end keeps coming back from review
Spacing taken by eye, review catches the mismatches, the task goes round again — every week.
Tools do not stick
It has been tried twice, and both times left scripts nobody maintains. That is why we start with one scenario and show the result before anything is agreed.
Short answers to the awkward questions
Will you replace our manual testers after all?
No. We take the typing and the repeats. The checking and the “bug or not” verdict are done by a person — and done better once there is time for it.
Do we have to install anything on work machines?
No. We work in the browser the team already has open: their profile, their logins, their session. Window focus is never taken.
Will you get into our autotests and CI?
We will not. That is the team’s own business. Our subject is the manual part of the work and preparing data.
What about access to our data?
The tool refuses everything outside the system under test and never executes arbitrary code — the set of actions is closed. Boundaries are put in writing before the pilot.
How will we know it got better?
By a before / after pair on your own scenarios. The measurement happens before the pilot — otherwise there is nothing to compare against.
What if our widgets are rare and hand-written?
The usual case. The engine works out what the element is and how to drive it; stubborn ones are taught on the spot, during the pilot.
Half an hour of conversation is enough to start
Tell us where checking slows down. We will show it on our own form and say what a tool takes off your plate and what is a matter of order rather than technique. If there is nothing to take, we will say so: selling you something surplus does not pay — you would simply leave after the first invoice.