AI that takes the typing out of manual testing, not the tester
An AI agent, Claude, Cursor or Codex driving our tools, does the mechanical part of a manual check in the browser your tester already has open. The person keeps the part that needs a person: deciding whether what they see is a bug, and whether it matters.
Start with a measured pilot
The tools are free for the pilot. Autotests and CI stay untouched.
What you get
- It works in the tester's real browser, with their logins, and never takes the window's focus.
- A whole form in one step: custom dropdowns, date pickers and attachments included.
- A scenario walked once is saved as a recipe. In one measured run on a real work app, the repeat took 9 calls instead of 19.
- A closed set of actions: no arbitrary code, and domains outside the system under test are refused.
- After the pilot, a licence from $149 a seat a year.
Questions and answers
Can AI replace manual testing?
Not in our approach. The agent brings the system to the state you need and does the typing; the verdict on what is a bug stays with a person.
Which AI does it use?
The one your team already uses: Claude Code, Cursor or Codex. We connect it during the pilot.
Does it touch our autotests or CI?
No. Shift speeds up the manual half of regression. Your automated suite and pipeline stay as they are.